Signs
Here are some of my latest pieces on the process philosophy of signs, following on from my book A Process Philosophy of Signs. The most recent ones are about politics, democracy and signs, particularly in terms of the politics, science and philosophical implications of Covid-19.
- The Danger of Group Signs: Philosophy and Covid-19
- Risky Signs: Philosophy and Covid-19
- Signs and Democracy
- Truth as the fullest: on journalism in the age of fake news (PDF)
- For F’s sake: Theresa May, falling letters and the philosophy of signs
- Diagrams of comic estrangement (PDF)
- Do signs have styles? (PDF)
- Whitehead’s symbolism as process philosophy of the sign (PDF)
- The process philosophy of signs is a pragmatism (PDF)
- Process semiology defined simply (PDF)
- A critique of corrective approaches to signs (PDF)
- How to diagram a process sign (PDF)
- Behind red doors: signs, process and the political (PDF)
- The sign is always political: ‘barbarian’ as burnt sign (PDF)
- Identity photographs and the process philosophy of signs (PDF)
- What is a diagram (for a sign)? (PDF)
- A process philosophy of signs – A sample from A Process Philosophy of Signs (EUP, 2016) (PDF)
- Process ontologies and the posthuman (PDF)
- Pragmatism of the sign (PDF)
- Whitehead’s curse (PDF)
- Do no harm: the extended mind model and the problem of delayed damage (PDF)